Explanation: The reason I chose this blog post for depth is because I used a secondary source in order to further analyze a poem. I first wrote an analysis based on what I observed from the poem, but I felt as though I was overlooking key concepts. So, I used a secondary source to help me broaden my understanding of the poem.
Explanation: I read Asim’s blog post and on the same essay I had read and found his interpretation to be very interesting. This is the best representation for interaction, for I used one of Asim’s ideas in my blog post and explained why I was so intrigued with his argument.
Explanation: There was a good Discussion between Asim and I on this blog post and I felt complied to show everybody how helpful it was. He explained to me how he like my commentary but felt as though I could’ve improved it. So, after hearing what he had to say I altered some aspects of my commentary and responded to his comment based on what I agreed and disagreed with.
Explanation: This was an example of a good discussion between Asim and I on his blog post. I started of by telling him I enjoyed reading his commentary but felt as though he could improve it in certain areas. He replied to my comment by explaining me why he chose to write his commentary in the fashion he did. I then acknowledged the fact that his method may have been the best for him and gave him one last piece of advice. This was a great example of an interesting and intellectual discussion on a blog post.
No comments:
Post a Comment